800-TEMPLE-MED Schedule Appointment
SEARCH TEMPLE HEALTH
Back To Doctor Search

Cardiology

William Van Decker, MD

William Van Decker
Schedule Appointment

Telemedicine appointments may be available for this physician.

Learn more about virtual visits

Specialties

Cardiology (General), Cardiovascular Imaging

5.0
92 Patient Satisfaction Ratings
About Me
Offices
Publications
Ratings & Reviews
About Me
Offices

Office Locations

Temple Heart & Vascular Institute

Temple University Hospital – Main Campus

3509 N. Broad Street

Boyer Pavilion, 4th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19140

800-TEMPLE-MED

Publications
Digital Bibliography
Publications

Dhond,A.; Kaatz, S.; Sokil, A.; Van Decker, W. Anticoagulation Therapy For Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Update. Monograph. Institute For Continuing Healthcare Education. 3/02.

Patel, A ; Fiss,D "Non-Invasive Imaging of the Coronary Arteries: The Beginning of a New Era." Cardiosource April 26 , 2006.

Scally, M; Patel,A. "Cardiac Amyloidosis : Is There a Role For Cardiac MRI." Cardiosource March 29, 2006.

Gryzwacz, F; Wald, J; "CMR Assessment of Post MI Pseudoaneurysm." Cardiosource June 28, 2006.

Kramer, H. "18 Year Old Female With Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Anomalous Coronary Artery." Cardiosource March 2006.

Kramer, H; Patel, A; 19 Year Old Male with Chest Pain and ECG Changes- a CMR case study. Cardiosource Sept. 2005.

Patel, A. "Can CMR Be Used For The Evaluation Of Transplant Arteriopathy." Cardiosource Nov. 2005.

Fiss, D. ; Patel, A.; "Coronary Calcium Score: A Brief Review." Cardiosource Jan. 2006.

Grando-Ting,J, Patel, A.; "Non-invasive Evaluation of Pericardial Effusion, a Cardiac MR and CT Case Report." Cardiosource Oct. 2005.

Grando-Ting, J. , Davidson,A. "Use of CMR In Adult Congenital Heart Disease." Cardiosource. Feb.2006.

Cardiosource CCT/CMR Case of the Month—Van Decker , Editor Cases by Temple Cardiology Fellows with mentoring.

Ratings & Reviews

92 Patient Satisfaction Reviews

Our Patient Satisfaction Rating is an average of all responses to care provider related questions from our nationally-recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey. Learn more about Patient Satisfaction Rating.

Overall Rating

5.00 / 5.0

Ratings Breakdown

5.0
Give easy to understand instruction
5.0
Provider expl in way you understand
5.0
Provider listen carefully to you
5.0
Show respect for what you say
5.0
Spend enough time with you
Patient Comments
5.0
June 21, 2022

Good & satisfactory experience.

5.0
May 16, 2022

The appoint with the staff was very good.

5.0
April 25, 2022

I've always found Doctor VanDecker & the staff to be professional, straight forward, serious yet comforting and slyly humorous.

5.0
April 25, 2022

They are concerned about my well being.

5.0
March 22, 2022

They are always concerned and I understand what they say

5.0
March 14, 2022

As always, Dr. Vandecker provides superior service. I trust him in all health related matters. He is kind , caring, professional and knowledgeable. He is a extraordinary example of Temple physicians. Thank you.

5.0
February 23, 2022

Dr Vandecker is an excellent provider. He was very thorough, explains everything, doesn't rush through my visits and seems genuinely concerned for my well being. I am so glad my PCP referred me to him. He is totally AWESOME!!!!!

5.0
January 5, 2022

Always a good experience with Dr. Vandecker.

5.0
December 27, 2021

I am very happy that William Van Decker is on my team.

5.0
October 18, 2021

Excellent overall.

5.0
September 20, 2021

Experience with physician Dr. Vandecker is good and is interested by all the situation.

5.0
August 16, 2021

Dr. Van Decker goes well above the his job. Great doctor

5.0
July 9, 2021

Excellent staff and an incredible doctor. Everyone is very helpful and knowledgeable.

5.0
July 2, 2021

Good.

5.0
April 27, 2021

Always excellent patient care.

5.0
April 23, 2021

Dr. William Vandecker & his staff showed to me concern for my issue. I would recommend him & the entire medical staff that I had take care of me at Temple Cardiology to my family and friends.

5.0
February 26, 2021

Since the years I have being attended with the Dr. VanDecker I will not change him for any.

5.0
February 25, 2021

Very good doctor and staff.